![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ben Dunn University of Glasgow Yuki Kamide University of Dundee Christoph Scheepers University of Glasgow
In the experiment reported here, 30 participants made a lexical decision on 120 spoken words and 120 spoken non-words. The words had either an upward (e.g. ‘moon’) or downward (e.g. ‘sewer’) spatial association, or they were neutral in this respect (e.g. ‘letter’). Participants made their lexical decisions by fixating a target located either above or below the centre of the screen, counterbalanced across participants. Saccade launch latencies to targets in a congruent spatial location (e.g., hearing ‘moon’ and looking up to confirm that the stimulus is a word) were significantly faster than those to targets in an incongruent location (e.g., hearing ‘moon’ and looking down to confirm that it is a word). Crucially, saccade launch latencies to incongruent target locations did not differ from those launched after hearing neutral words. Our results extend earlier findings (Dudschig et al., 2013) by showing that language-related spatial associations facilitate eye movements towards congruent locations rather than inhibiting eye movements towards incongruent locations.
Hearing “moon” and looking up: Word-related spatial associations facilitate saccades to congruent locations (452 KB)