The contrasting roles of shape in human vision and convolutional neural networks
- Gaurav Malhotra, Psychological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Jeff Bowers, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
AbstractConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) were inspired by human vision and, in some settings, achieve a performance comparable to human object recognition. This has lead to the speculation that both systems use similar mechanisms to perform recognition. In this study, we conducted a series of simulations that indicate that there is a fundamental difference between human vision and vanilla CNNs: while object recognition in humans relies on analysing shape, these CNNs do not have such a shape-bias. We teased apart the type of features selected by the model by modifying the CIFAR-10 dataset so that, in addition to containing objects with shape, the images concurrently contained non-shape features, such as a noise-like mask. When trained on these modified set of images, the model did not show any bias towards selecting shapes as features. Instead it relied on whichever feature allowed it to perform the best prediction -- even when this feature was a noise-like mask or a single predictive pixel amongst 50176 pixels.
Return to previous page