Exact number concepts depend on language
- Benjamin Pitt, Psychology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
- Edward Gibson, Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
- Steven Piantadosi, Psychology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
AbstractThe ability to represent large exact numbers is unique to humans. On some proposals, this capacity depends crucially on language; learning the count list ("one", "two", "three", etc.) allows children to represent the exact cardinality of numbers larger than four. On alternative proposals, this ability depends not on language but on innate pre-verbal counting processes. Here, we conducted a non-verbal test of large exact number concepts in the Tsimane', an indigenous Amazonian culture in which adults vary widely in their knowledge of the verbal count list. Participants correctly matched the number of objects in a response set to the number in a sample set but only for cardinalities that were within their verbal count range. For larger cardinalities, they reproduced sets that were only approximately matched in number. The findings challenge accounts that posit pre-verbal number concepts and support the Whorfian view that language can enable new conceptual abilities.
Return to previous page